AI Video Generators in Advertising: Should Businesses Use Them?

Illustration of a video camera split diagonally with one half as a traditional camera and the other half as a glowing AI brain made of circuit lines, set against a blue-teal gradient background with play icons

AI video generators can create ad content in hours instead of weeks, at a fraction of traditional production costs. But before you ditch your video team, you need to understand when AI video works—and when it backfires.

The short answer: AI video works well for specific use cases like stock footage replacement and playful content, but it’s not ready to replace human creativity for serious campaigns. Most successful brands are using a hybrid approach, letting AI handle production efficiency while humans provide strategic vision and emotional authenticity.

Current State of AI Video in Advertising

Recent weeks have brought conversations with major brands asking why they’re spending tens of thousands on ad creatives when AI tools like Veo 3 can produce similar content at a fraction of the cost.

The technology has advanced rapidly. Tools like Veo 3 can generate hyper-realistic videos that many viewers “can’t distinguish from authentic footage.” But there’s a catch—these platforms automatically watermark their content, making AI generation immediately obvious to viewers.

When AI Video Works for Advertising

Stock Footage Replacement

AI video excels as a replacement for stock video. If you’d feel comfortable using stock footage for a scene, AI can probably handle it better and cheaper.

This works well for:

  • B-roll footage of cities, nature scenes, or abstract concepts
  • Background visuals that support your main message
  • Demonstrating concepts that don’t require human faces

One industry expert noted that AI video is essentially “an OK replacement for stock footage”—useful for background visuals and pre-production storyboards. AI gives you exactly what you need instead of forcing you to compromise with whatever exists in stock libraries.

Playful and Humorous Content

AI video’s slight “off-kilter” quality can be an asset for brands with a sense of humor. The viral “Pepperoni Hug Spot” demonstrated how AI’s quirks can capture attention through meme-worthy charm, garnering over 2 million views in two days.

This approach works for:

  • Social media campaigns that don’t take themselves seriously
  • Brands targeting younger, tech-savvy demographics
  • Content where novelty and attention-grabbing matter more than emotional connection
@tjrobertson52

Big brands asking why spend $10K on ads when AI costs $10? Here’s when AI video actually works (and when it doesn’t) 🤖✨ #AIVideo #Marketing #AdTech #contentcreatorstruggles #MarketingTips

♬ original sound – TJ Robertson – TJ Robertson

Why People Can Tell It’s AI (And Why That Matters)

Anyone claiming viewers can’t detect AI video is wrong. People can tell, and here’s how:

Watermarks: Advanced tools like Veo 3 automatically add visible watermarks. Google also embeds invisible digital watermarks (SynthID) that software can detect.

Visual tells: Even high-quality AI video has subtle signs—vacant eyes, unnatural skin shine, odd movement patterns, or strange editing rhythms. Research shows viewers consistently notice these irregularities.

Context clues: If visuals look impossibly perfect or fantastical yet photorealistic, audiences assume AI involvement.

Public Sentiment: Mixed but Evolving

Public opinion breaks into three groups:

Enthusiasts (10%): Tech-savvy viewers who appreciate innovation and find AI content interesting or amusing.

Detractors (10%): People who find AI content “soulless” or are concerned about its impact on creative jobs. They may boycott brands using AI heavily.

Neutral majority (80%): Most people don’t have strong opinions—yet. They judge content on relevance and engagement, not production method.

This sentiment is evolving rapidly. Coca-Cola’s AI Christmas commercial illustrated the risks—while 83% of reactions were neutral, vocal criticism called it “soulless” and “uninspiring,” creating negative PR buzz.

The Authenticity Problem

NielsenIQ research found that consumers view AI-generated ads as less authentic and memorable than human-made content. There’s a “gap between the AI content and existing memory structures”—people’s brains don’t connect as deeply with AI visuals.

This matters because authenticity drives trust, and trust drives purchasing decisions. If an ad feels inauthentic, audiences might extend that feeling to the brand itself.

When to Avoid AI Video

Sensitive or serious topics: Healthcare, financial services, charity appeals, or memorial content require genuine human emotion. AI struggles with subtle emotional cues like trembling voices or authentic tears.

High-stakes campaigns: When emotional connection is crucial, human creativity remains superior. Any glitch or oddity in AI content about serious issues could offend viewers or break emotional connection.

Conservative audiences: If your customers value tradition or include many who are skeptical of technology, AI video could alienate your core market.

AI vs. Traditional Production: The Real Comparison

Cost and Speed

  • AI video: Hours to days, fraction of traditional costs
  • Traditional: Weeks to months, tens of thousands in production costs

Quality and Authenticity

  • AI video: Good visual quality but lacks emotional nuance
  • Traditional: Superior emotional resonance and brand connection

Flexibility

  • AI video: Unlimited variations for A/B testing
  • Traditional: Expensive to create multiple versions

Trust Factor

  • AI video: Risk of seeming inauthentic or cheap
  • Traditional: Established credibility with audiences

The Future of AI Video in Advertising

AI content will likely become normalized within a few years as quality improves and costs drop further. We’ll probably see a flood of high-quality AI content across the internet.

But this creates an opportunity. As AI content becomes ubiquitous, human-created content will become more valuable as a differentiator. Audiences will crave authentic human connections, making genuine content more impactful.

Smart businesses should experiment with AI video now while being thoughtful about implementation. The goal isn’t to replace human creativity but to use AI for efficiency while keeping humans in control of strategy and emotional connection.

Best Practices for Using AI Video

Start small: Test AI video for low-risk content like social media posts or background footage.

Be transparent: Over 75% of consumers want companies to disclose AI-generated content. Honesty prevents backlash.

Focus on hybrid approaches: Use AI for production efficiency while humans handle creative strategy and final polish.

Monitor reactions: Watch how your audience responds and be ready to adjust if sentiment turns negative.

Maintain quality standards: Poor AI content reflects poorly on your brand. Invest in proper prompting and human oversight.

Should Your Business Use AI Video Generators?

Yes, but strategically. AI video generators offer real benefits for businesses willing to use them thoughtfully:

  • Lower production costs for content that doesn’t require human emotion
  • Faster iteration for testing multiple creative approaches
  • Unlimited stock footage replacement on demand
  • Creative possibilities for concepts impossible to film

Avoid AI video when authenticity matters most—serious topics, emotional campaigns, or conservative audiences. Use it for efficiency gains while keeping human creativity at the center of your strategy.

The brands that succeed will blend AI efficiency with human authenticity. They’ll use AI to handle production heavy lifting while ensuring humans provide the strategic vision, emotional intelligence, and final quality control that audiences still crave.

Ready to build a video marketing strategy that combines AI efficiency with human authenticity? Our team at TJ Digital helps businesses navigate emerging technologies while maintaining genuine brand connections. We’ll help you determine when AI video makes sense for your campaigns and when traditional approaches deliver better results.


Sources: